# Assessment Centre Exercise Score Merge Review

Review the weighting before exercise scores are merged into one centre score.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Exercise scores, documented weights and candidate list.

## Workflow
1. Record the documented weight per exercise.
2. Recompute the merged score per candidate.
3. Flag merges where an undocumented weight changed the ranking.
4. Return the merge review without selection decisions.

## Output contract
candidate | exercise | weight | merged_score | rank_shift | decision_unproved

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional weights 50/30/20. Merging at equal thirds moves candidate B above candidate A; the undocumented shift, not the performance, decides the order.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/selection-factsheet/

Checked October 18, 2026. Oct17 live AIS Search Console (sc-domain property, tej@groweasy.ai, Saturday audit): Oct 9-15 complete week 22 clicks, 937 impressions, 2.3% CTR, position 10.6, day-row verified. Top queries: Muse India 125i (3-month), Planable/Claude social agent 45i, marketing Copilot 37i, Planable/ChatGPT 24i, investor agents 19i, Copilot investment-committee 14i, cash flow forecasting 13i, campaign brief 12i. Google Trends verified Oct 17: muse glimmer/spark rising. Site impressions are query leads, not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.