# Assessment Method Resource Fit Review

Compare documented selection methods against the job and delivery constraints without ranking candidates.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Job criteria, proposed methods, evidence of validity, assessor resources, candidate time and access arrangements.

## Workflow
1. Map methods to job-related criteria and supplied validity evidence.
2. Record delivery resources and candidate burden separately from assessment scores.
3. Flag methods with no criterion mapping or unresolved access arrangements.
4. Return process choices for trained review; no applicant ranking or selection decision.

## Output contract
method | criterion | validity_evidence | resource_need | candidate_time | access_gap | reviewer_question

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional case task maps to spreadsheet accuracy but requires software candidates were not told about. Record resource/access gap. A cheaper unvalidated personality quiz is not automatically the better method.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/selection-factsheet/

Checked October 10, 2026. Oct10 live AIS Search Console through Oct6: marketing Copilot 37 impressions, Planable/Claude 33, Planable/ChatGPT 23, campaign brief 12, investor agent 19. Social-review/reporting topics follow these parent-query leads. Other professions follow documented workflow needs, not measured exact search intent. Site impressions are not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.