# Assessment Practical Arrangements Consistency

Check whether candidates received the documented test notice, duration and adjustment route without equating access needs with ability.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Assessment version, candidate notice log, required duration/materials, adjustment request route, approved arrangements and privacy limits.

## Workflow
1. Compare supplied notices to the documented test version and required practical information.
2. Separate a missing notice from a candidate failing to prepare.
3. Record the adjustment route and authorized arrangements without exposing diagnosis or inferring capability.
4. Return process gaps for human review; no applicant score, eligibility verdict or invitation is sent.

## Output contract
candidate_token | test_version | notice_evidence | duration_info | materials_info | adjustment_route | process_gap

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional candidate A received notice for 60 minutes but assigned test was 90 minutes. Flag inconsistent notice, not poor time management. A request for accessible materials does not reduce the candidate score.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/selection-factsheet/

Checked October 9, 2026. Oct 9 live AIS Search Console through Oct 6: marketing Copilot 37 impressions, Planable/Claude 33, Planable/ChatGPT 23, campaign brief 12, investor agent 19. Social-review/reporting topics follow these parent-query leads. Other professions follow documented workflow needs, not measured exact search intent. Site impressions are not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.