# Assessment Technology Notice Evidence

Check whether candidates were told about the actual technology used in a selection exercise.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Assessment version, required tools, candidate notice log, access arrangements and privacy limits.

## Workflow
1. Compare actual tool requirements to dated candidate notices.
2. Separate missing technical notice from candidate ability.
3. Record access questions without diagnosing a disability or lowering scores.
4. Return process gaps for trained review; no invite or ranking.

## Output contract
test_version | required_technology | notice_evidence | access_route | gap | reviewer

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional task requires video softwareB but notice named browser only. Flag technology-notice gap, not poor preparation. No notice export is unknown, not proof nobody was notified.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/selection-factsheet/

Checked October 11, 2026. Oct11 live AIS Search Console: marketing Copilot37 impressions, Planable/Claude35, Planable/ChatGPT24, campaignbrief12, investoragent19, MuseIndia98. Social calendar/reporting topics follow parent-query leads; other professions follow documented workflow needs, not measured exact intent. Site impressions are not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.