# Bank Fee Self-Account Entry Screen

Inspect an apparent duplicate fee for a bank-to-same-bank category before deleting records.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Fee transaction ID,bank account,debit/credit category,statement line and audit evidence.

## Workflow
1. Match the two visible entries to the same transaction.
2. Use Intuit documented same-bank debit/credit assignment as a possible cause.
3. Keep recategorization to an expense as a reviewer proposal,not executed repair.
4. Return evidence gap without deleting or posting.

## Output contract
fee | bank_account | counterpart_account | same_account | statement | proposed_review | hold

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional fee T1 uses bank A for both bank account and category and appears twice. Flag a self-account coding hypothesis; two views do not establish two real bank fees.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://quickbooks.intuit.com/learn-support/en-us/help-article/bank-transactions/interest-bank-charge-shows-twice-reconciling/L3hHpLTQQ_US_en_US

Checked October 15, 2026. Oct15 live AIS Search Console: marketing Copilot37 impressions, Planable/Claude45, Planable/ChatGPT24, campaignbrief12, investoragent19, MuseIndia115, cashflowforecasting13. Social calendar/reporting topics follow parent-query leads; other professions follow documented workflow needs, not measured exact intent. Site impressions are not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.
