# Candidate Assessment Feedback Source Map

Prepare job-related feedback evidence without inventing reasons for a selection decision.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Approved feedback scope, job criteria, recorded assessment observations, source IDs, reviewer notes and recipient/privacy restrictions.

## Workflow
1. Match each proposed feedback point to observed job-related evidence and rubric version.
2. Exclude unsupported motive, personality diagnosis, other-candidate details and restricted notes.
3. Separate observed performance from the authorized decision reason; unknown reasons stay unknown.
4. Return a private preparation map for a trained reviewer; no rejection message or candidate ranking.

## Output contract
feedback_point | criterion | observed_evidence | source | restriction | reviewer_approval_needed

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional notes show one incorrect calculation but no agreed rejection reason. A factual calculation observation may be prepared; do not say the candidate was rejected for poor cultural fit or mention another candidate.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/selection-factsheet/

Checked October 9, 2026. Oct 9 live AIS Search Console through Oct 6: marketing Copilot 37 impressions, Planable/Claude 33, Planable/ChatGPT 23, campaign brief 12, investor agent 19. Social-review/reporting topics follow these parent-query leads. Other professions follow documented workflow needs, not measured exact search intent. Site impressions are not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.