# Deposit Grouping Cutoff Evidence

Compare bank grouping with receipt cutoff before combining cash from different deposits.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Bank deposit references, receipt IDs/date/time, deposit batch policy, cutoff and timezone.

## Workflow
1. Match bank grouping evidence before choosing a receipt combination.
2. Keep same-day receipts in different bank batches separate.
3. Use supplied cutoff to explain timing without forcing an amount match.
4. Return unresolved grouping for accountant review; no deposit is recorded.

## Output contract
bank_reference | receipts | cutoff_zone | batch_evidence | sum | excluded_reason | hold

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional receipts 60+40 before cutoff form bank D100; later 30 belongs next batch. Do not include 30 because the date matches. Missing batch proof means 100 sum alone is not a confirmed match.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://quickbooks.intuit.com/learn-support/en-us/help-article/bank-registers/fix-quickbooks-payment-deposits-match-bank/L7o0PT2fW_US_en_US

Checked October 11, 2026. Oct11 live AIS Search Console: marketing Copilot37 impressions, Planable/Claude35, Planable/ChatGPT24, campaignbrief12, investoragent19, MuseIndia98. Social calendar/reporting topics follow parent-query leads; other professions follow documented workflow needs, not measured exact intent. Site impressions are not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.