# Interview Independent Score Timing Register

Check whether individual response scores preceded panel discussion.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Response IDs, reviewer score timestamps, discussion start evidence and independent note versions.

## Workflow
1. Match score and discussion records to the same candidate/response.
2. Apply CIPD recommendation for independent scoring before group discussion.
3. Distinguish late score entry from proof of influence; missing evidence stays unknown.
4. Return process exceptions, not candidate ratings or hiring choices.

## Output contract
candidate | response | reviewer | score_time | discussion_start | independent_evidence | hold

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional A score is at10:00,discussion starts10:05,B score entered10:08. A has supplied pre-discussion evidence; B timing needs review, not a conclusion that B was biased.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/selection-factsheet/

Checked October 13, 2026. Oct13 live AIS Search Console: marketing Copilot37 impressions, Planable/Claude43, Planable/ChatGPT24, campaignbrief12, investoragent19, MuseIndia103. Social calendar/reporting topics follow parent-query leads; other professions follow documented workflow needs, not measured exact intent. Site impressions are not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.