# Interview Missing Evidence Hold

Separate a not-observed assessment criterion from evidence of poor performance.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Role criteria and rubric; interview notes tied to question IDs; candidate response opportunities; missing-note reason; reviewer policy.

## Workflow
1. Match each criterion to the assigned question and actual opportunity to respond.
2. Classify evidence as observed, not asked, note missing or response unclear.
3. Do not convert missing evidence into a zero score; apply only the authorized missing-data policy.
4. Prepare consistent follow-up questions for human review; do not rank or decide hiring.

## Output contract
criterion | question | opportunity | evidence_state | source | permitted_followup | score_hold

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional criterion C was never asked. Mark not asked, not poor performance. Candidate B's unclear answer is a different state; neither receives an invented score.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/evidence-reviews/evidence-fair-selection/

Checked October 8, 2026. Oct8 live GSC through Oct5: marketing copilot 37 impressions, Planable/Claude 33 and Planable/ChatGPT 23, campaign brief 12 and reports 11. Marketing/social topics follow these parent-query leads; other professions follow method-source workflow needs, not exact query measurements. Exact monthly volume is unmeasured.