# Label Coverage Consistency Review

Review that every planned post carries the labels the campaign filter expects.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Post list, assigned labels and the campaign label filter.

## Workflow
1. Record the labels the campaign filter uses.
2. Match each post against its assigned labels.
3. Flag posts missing the filter labels or holding retired labels.
4. Return the coverage review without editing labels.

## Output contract
post | expected_labels | assigned_labels | missing | retired_label | filter_match_unproved

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional campaign filter needs label Spring-Launch. Two of eight posts lack it, so the filter view would show six posts while the plan says eight; one post still holds the retired Draft-2025 label.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://help.planable.io/hc/en-us/articles/21715363601052-Labels

Checked October 18, 2026. Oct17 live AIS Search Console (sc-domain property, tej@groweasy.ai, Saturday audit): Oct 9-15 complete week 22 clicks, 937 impressions, 2.3% CTR, position 10.6, day-row verified. Top queries: Muse India 125i (3-month), Planable/Claude social agent 45i, marketing Copilot 37i, Planable/ChatGPT 24i, investor agents 19i, Copilot investment-committee 14i, cash flow forecasting 13i, campaign brief 12i. Google Trends verified Oct 17: muse glimmer/spark rising. Site impressions are query leads, not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.