# Recycled Post Single-Platform Eligibility

Check recurrence preparation against the single-platform boundary before proposing a grouped sequence.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Post IDs, platform grouping, desired interval/count and current recurrence documentation.

## Workflow
1. Identify whether the supplied post is one-platform or grouped.
2. Apply Planable documentation: recycling is available when creating one-platform posts, not grouped posts.
3. Keep missing grouping evidence held and split proposals unapproved.
4. Return eligibility and preparation questions, not a schedule action.

## Output contract
post | platform_scope | grouped | interval | repeats | eligibility_hold

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional A is a grouped LinkedIn/Facebook post; B is LinkedIn-only. A is outside the documented recycling route. B meets the platform condition but still needs actual approval/settings evidence.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://help.planable.io/hc/en-us/articles/21715345820828-Recycled-or-Recurring-posts

Checked October 13, 2026. Oct13 live AIS Search Console: marketing Copilot37 impressions, Planable/Claude43, Planable/ChatGPT24, campaignbrief12, investoragent19, MuseIndia103. Social calendar/reporting topics follow parent-query leads; other professions follow documented workflow needs, not measured exact intent. Site impressions are not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.