# Reference Question Job Criterion Map

Prepare reference questions linked to job criteria without turning hearsay into assessment facts.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Approved reference scope, job criteria, proposed questions, referee relationship and privacy restrictions.

## Workflow
1. Map each question to a documented job requirement.
2. Separate observed work examples from opinions and unsupported personal information.
3. Keep referee relationship and missing knowledge visible.
4. Return a private question map for review; no referee contacted or offer withdrawn.

## Output contract
question | job_criterion | observation_requested | referee_scope | restricted_data | review

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional question asks whether applicant met documented project deadlines; it maps to delivery criteria. A question about family plans does not. Referee with no direct supervision knowledge is marked limited, not a negative reference.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/selection-factsheet/

Checked October 10, 2026. Oct10 live AIS Search Console through Oct6: marketing Copilot 37 impressions, Planable/Claude 33, Planable/ChatGPT 23, campaign brief 12, investor agent 19. Social-review/reporting topics follow these parent-query leads. Other professions follow documented workflow needs, not measured exact search intent. Site impressions are not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.