# Selection Criterion Weight Version Map

Trace which approved rubric-weight version governed each assessment.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Rubric versions, effective dates, approvals, assessment references and HR policy.

## Workflow
1. Record exact version weights and check their sum.
2. Match assessments to their approved version, not current rubric by default.
3. Hold cross-version score comparisons until HR approves a comparable basis.
4. Return a version map; no reranking or retrospective policy rewrite.

## Output contract
version | effective date | weights/sum | assessment reference | approval | comparison gap

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional weights change 60/40 to 40/60. Both sum 100, but a shared score label does not prove comparable results; unknown version is held.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/selection-factsheet/

Checked October 7, 2026. Oct7 GSC chart throughOct4: marketing copilot37,PlanableClaude33/ChatGPT23,brief12,report11; other profession topics are related workflow-method demand leads, not exact queries. Exact monthly volume unmeasured.