# Selection Evidence Consistency Review

Check that each selection claim ties back to a recorded assessment result.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Candidate assessment records and summary claims.

## Workflow
1. List assessment methods used.
2. Tie each summary claim to a recorded result.
3. Flag claims with no recorded evidence.
4. Return the consistency review without selection decisions.

## Output contract
claim | method | record | evidenced | unevidenced | decision_unproved

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional summary says strong numeracy for two finalists; only one has a recorded test result. The claim stands for one candidate and stays unproved for the other.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/selection-factsheet/

Checked October 16, 2026. Oct16 live AIS Search Console (sc-domain property, tej@groweasy.ai): 42 clicks, 3.29k impressions, 1.3% CTR, position 14.5, chart Sep 12-Oct 13, last update 6h. Top queries: Muse India 125i, Planable/Claude social agent 45i, marketing Copilot 37i, Planable/ChatGPT 24i, investor agents 19i, Copilot investment-committee 14i, cash flow forecasting 13i, campaign brief 12i. Site impressions are query leads, not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.