# Social Inbox Reply Permission Crosscheck

Separate visibility of an inbox from permission to reply before preparing a team handoff.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Workspace members, stable user IDs, dated Social Inbox permission export, intended responder and reviewed audience policy.

## Workflow
1. Confirm the exact workspace and member identity, not a display-name match.
2. Read visibility and reply capability separately using the supplied export.
3. Flag unknown or absent reply permissions and stale membership snapshots.
4. Prepare a permission question for the owner; do not grant access, draft a customer promise or send a reply.

## Output contract
workspace | member_id | visible_evidence | reply_permission | version | unresolved_access

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional member M can see Social Inbox but reply permission is off. Keep view access and reply access separate. An older screenshot does not override a current supplied permission export.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://help.planable.io/hc/en-us/articles/29213177431836-Managing-your-Social-Inbox

Checked October 9, 2026. Oct 9 live AIS Search Console through Oct 6: marketing Copilot 37 impressions, Planable/Claude 33, Planable/ChatGPT 23, campaign brief 12, investor agent 19. Social-review/reporting topics follow these parent-query leads. Other professions follow documented workflow needs, not measured exact search intent. Site impressions are not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.