# Social Sentiment Sample Coverage Note

Keep a missing sentiment panel separate from the actual tone of social comments.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Post/comment IDs, supplied count and text, source cutoff, sentiment-panel evidence and current method documentation.

## Workflow
1. Count stable comment IDs within the supplied scope and note incomplete exports.
2. Record whether the source documents a minimum comment count for sentiment display.
3. Separate absent panel, missing data and supplied model label; no absent panel becomes Neutral.
4. Prepare a human review of exact comments without claiming sentiment accuracy or changing priority automatically.

## Output contract
post | unique_comments | export_complete | panel_state | source_threshold | human_review_note

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional post has four supplied comments and no panel. Planable documents display from at least five comments. Do not label all four Neutral; a negative complaint still needs human review. Five comments do not prove a panel exists in the account.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://help.planable.io/hc/en-us/articles/29213177431836-Managing-your-Social-Inbox

Checked October 9, 2026. Oct 9 live AIS Search Console through Oct 6: marketing Copilot 37 impressions, Planable/Claude 33, Planable/ChatGPT 23, campaign brief 12, investor agent 19. Social-review/reporting topics follow these parent-query leads. Other professions follow documented workflow needs, not measured exact search intent. Site impressions are not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.