# Structured Interview Question Consistency Check

Review that every candidate faced the same core questions before scores are compared.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Interview guides, asked-question records and candidate list.

## Workflow
1. Record the core question set from the guide.
2. Match each candidate’s record against the set.
3. Flag candidates asked a materially different set.
4. Return the consistency check without rescoring.

## Output contract
candidate | core_questions_asked | deviation | comparable | rescore_unproved

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional set of six core questions. One candidate record shows four; comparing their score against six-question candidates treats unequal evidence as equal.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/selection-factsheet/

Checked October 18, 2026. Oct17 live AIS Search Console (sc-domain property, tej@groweasy.ai, Saturday audit): Oct 9-15 complete week 22 clicks, 937 impressions, 2.3% CTR, position 10.6, day-row verified. Top queries: Muse India 125i (3-month), Planable/Claude social agent 45i, marketing Copilot 37i, Planable/ChatGPT 24i, investor agents 19i, Copilot investment-committee 14i, cash flow forecasting 13i, campaign brief 12i. Google Trends verified Oct 17: muse glimmer/spark rising. Site impressions are query leads, not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.