# Timetable Slot Coverage Versus Plan Check

Compare the week plan against occupied timetable slots before treating the calendar as full.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Week plan with planned slots per platform and the timetable occupancy list.

## Workflow
1. Record the planned slots per platform for the week.
2. Match each planned slot to an occupied timetable slot.
3. Flag planned slots with no post and occupied slots outside the plan.
4. Return the coverage map without moving posts.

## Output contract
platform | planned_slot | occupied | unplanned_fill | coverage | move_unproved

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional plan sets five slots; the timetable shows four occupied plus one occupied slot that is not in the plan. Counting five filled slots overstates coverage by the unplanned fill.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://help.planable.io/hc/en-us/articles/21715312418716-Timetable

Checked October 18, 2026. Oct17 live AIS Search Console (sc-domain property, tej@groweasy.ai, Saturday audit): Oct 9-15 complete week 22 clicks, 937 impressions, 2.3% CTR, position 10.6, day-row verified. Top queries: Muse India 125i (3-month), Planable/Claude social agent 45i, marketing Copilot 37i, Planable/ChatGPT 24i, investor agents 19i, Copilot investment-committee 14i, cash flow forecasting 13i, campaign brief 12i. Google Trends verified Oct 17: muse glimmer/spark rising. Site impressions are query leads, not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.