# Undeposited Funds Payment Link Completeness

Check that a bank deposit is backed by the right receipt links rather than a new income entry.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Deposit/receipt IDs, Undeposited Funds register, bank line and original invoice links.

## Workflow
1. Trace each deposit component to a supplied customer receipt.
2. Keep receipt existence separate from inclusion in the particular deposit.
3. Identify income entries that could duplicate already-recorded receipts.
4. Return a private completeness map; no transaction is created or removed.

## Output contract
deposit | receipt | invoice_link | included_evidence | income_duplicate_risk | missing

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional invoice paymentP already records 100 inUndeposited Funds. DepositD has noP link. A new income 100 would risk counting receipt twice; propose review, not an entry.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://quickbooks.intuit.com/learn-support/en-us/help-article/bank-registers/fix-quickbooks-payment-deposits-match-bank/L7o0PT2fW_US_en_US

Checked October 11, 2026. Oct11 live AIS Search Console: marketing Copilot37 impressions, Planable/Claude35, Planable/ChatGPT24, campaignbrief12, investoragent19, MuseIndia98. Social calendar/reporting topics follow parent-query leads; other professions follow documented workflow needs, not measured exact intent. Site impressions are not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.