# Work Sample Rubric Consistency Check

Score two assessors against the same rubric before comparing candidates.

## Scope
Preparation and review only. No account action or professional decision.

## Inputs
Rubric criteria, assessor scores and candidate work samples.

## Workflow
1. Record rubric criteria and anchors.
2. Compare assessor scores criterion by criterion.
3. Flag criteria where assessors diverge beyond the agreed band.
4. Return the consistency check without hiring decisions.

## Output contract
criterion | assessor_a | assessor_b | gap | within_band | decision_unproved

## Fictional acceptance test
Fictional rubric band 1 point. On criterion accuracy, scores 4 and 2 give a gap of 2, outside the band. Averaging to 3 would hide the disagreement the review exists to catch.

## Review gates
Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

## Method source
https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/selection-factsheet/

Checked October 16, 2026. Oct16 live AIS Search Console (sc-domain property, tej@groweasy.ai): 42 clicks, 3.29k impressions, 1.3% CTR, position 14.5, chart Sep 12-Oct 13, last update 6h. Top queries: Muse India 125i, Planable/Claude social agent 45i, marketing Copilot 37i, Planable/ChatGPT 24i, investor agents 19i, Copilot investment-committee 14i, cash flow forecasting 13i, campaign brief 12i. Site impressions are query leads, not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured.