Assessment Method Validity Source Register

Keep a selection-method validity claim tied to evidence relevant to the role and population. Preparation only, not an account action.

What to provide

Proposed method, vendor claim, study/source scope, job criteria, target population and reviewer instructions.

How it works

1. Record claimed validity and source provenance separately.
2. Compare studied outcome/population with intended job criteria.
3. Keep missing or mismatched validation evidence as unresolved.
4. Return a process evidence register; no candidate score or hiring decision.

The output

method | claim | source | studied_outcome | population_match | job_match | hold

Worked fictional example

Fictional vendor cites student quiz accuracy for managerial performance. Record scope mismatch; it is not validated prediction of manager job performance. Do not label applicants unsuitable.

Checks and limits

Keep source versions and original values. Unknowns stay unknown. Use qualified review for regulated, legal or hiring decisions. No live account compatibility test, send, share, schedule, ledger change or payment is authorized.

More recruiters workflows · How-to guides

Method: reviewed source. Demand lead: Oct 11 live AIS Search Console: marketing Copilot 37 impressions, Planable/Claude 35, Planable/ChatGPT24, campaignbrief 12, investoragent 19, MuseIndia 98. Social calendar/reporting topics follow parent-query leads; other professions follow documented workflow needs, not measured exact intent. Site impressions are not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured. Checked October 11, 2026.