Surface conflicting panel scores and missing anchors before a hiring review. The download provides a specific review process. It does not make decisions or act in an account.
Download the free skill
One complete Markdown file. No subscription, checkout or fabricated setup files.
Download SKILL.mdWhat to provide
Panel notes, job-related rubric versions, ratings and verified candidate ID.
How it works
- Align candidate ID, question, rubric version and rating range.
- Quote evidence for each score; a missing note stays unknown, not zero.
- Separate evidence conflict from rubric interpretation. Do not average incompatible scales.
- Return disputed anchors and reviewer questions, not a hiring decision.
The output
candidate/question | reviewer | scale/version | score | evidence | conflict type | question
Worked fictional example
Fictional reviewer A scores 4/5 and B scores 2/3. Do not average them to 3. B has no note, so its evidence stays unknown. Same-scale disagreement still needs review.
Checks and limits
Preserve source versions and original values. Unknowns stay unknown. Use a qualified reviewer for regulated, legal or hiring decisions. No send, share, account change, schedule, ledger update or payment is authorized. No live account test is claimed.
More recruiters workflows · How-to guides
Method: reviewed source. Demand lead: GCScandidate/recruitmentcluster;distinctfromredactionandversionmatch. These are site-query cluster impressions and method evidence, not exact new-topic monthly search volume or a traffic promise. Checked October 3, 2026.