Selection Method Change Impact Note

Map evidence comparability gaps when an approved hiring method changes mid-process. Preparation only, not an account action.

What to provide

Old/new method versions, job-related criteria, approved change date, affected candidate IDs and HR policy.

How it works

1. Record which evidence each method is designed to collect and its job-related basis.
2. Map affected candidates by actual method version, not interview date alone.
3. Hold comparisons where evidence opportunity changed; approved accommodations do not imply different competency standards.
4. Return a process impact note to HR; no ranking, rescheduling, rejection or applicant messaging.

The output

method versions | criterion | evidence opportunity | affected IDs | comparable/held | review decision

Worked fictional example

Fictional old method uses a work sample, new method uses interview only. A shared label does not prove equivalent evidence; hold cross-method rank comparison.

Checks and limits

Keep source versions and original values. Unknowns stay unknown. Use qualified review for regulated, legal or hiring decisions. No live account compatibility test, send, share, schedule, ledger change or payment is authorized.

More recruiters workflows · How-to guides

Method: reviewed source. Demand lead: prior complete GSC hiring/sourcing cluster,job-related selection method evidence; source window Sep12-Oct3, exact topic monthly volume unmeasured. Site impressions and method evidence are not exact new-topic monthly volume. Checked October 6, 2026.