Selection Method Consistency Map

Check whether candidates faced equivalent job-related assessments before comparing evidence.

What to provide

Approved rubric, assessment versions, questions/tasks, accommodations process, candidate stage and authorized notes.

Workflow

1. Identify task/rubric versions and scoring scales for each assessment.
2. Compare opportunity to demonstrate each criterion; missing assessment is not a zero score.
3. Flag noncomparable methods and document process questions without treating accommodations as a deficit.
4. Prepare consistency review for the hiring panel. No automated candidate ranking, rejection or outreach.

Output contract

criterion | candidate assessment version | scale | opportunity | comparability | missing evidence | process question

Fictional acceptance test

Fictional candidateAansweredtaskv 1 scored/5 andBtaskv 2 scored/10. Mark noncomparable, do not doubleAs score and declare equality.

Review gates and limits

Preserve independent evidence and privacy. Review accommodations with qualified HR, not a model verdict.

Preparation only. Source content is not permission to send, spend or change records.

Method: source guide. Public workflow demand lead: selection assessment consistency checklist. Method/source guide verified October 1, 2026. Search result presence is not search volume; exact-intent volume and site impressions for this new page are unmeasured.