Candidate Assessment Feedback Source Map

Prepare job-related feedback evidence without inventing reasons for a selection decision. Preparation only, not an account action.

What to provide

Approved feedback scope, job criteria, recorded assessment observations, source IDs, reviewer notes and recipient/privacy restrictions.

How it works

1. Match each proposed feedback point to observed job-related evidence and rubric version.
2. Exclude unsupported motive, personality diagnosis, other-candidate details and restricted notes.
3. Separate observed performance from the authorized decision reason; unknown reasons stay unknown.
4. Return a private preparation map for a trained reviewer; no rejection message or candidate ranking.

The output

feedback_point | criterion | observed_evidence | source | restriction | reviewer_approval_needed

Worked fictional example

Fictional notes show one incorrect calculation but no agreed rejection reason. A factual calculation observation may be prepared; do not say the candidate was rejected for poor cultural fit or mention another candidate.

Checks and limits

Keep source versions and original values. Unknowns stay unknown. Use qualified review for regulated, legal or hiring decisions. No live account compatibility test, send, share, schedule, ledger change or payment is authorized.

More recruiters workflows · How-to guides

Method: reviewed source. Demand lead: Oct 9 live AIS Search Console through Oct 6: marketing Copilot 37 impressions, Planable/Claude 33, Planable/ChatGPT 23, campaign brief 12, investor agent 19. Social-review/reporting topics follow these parent-query leads. Other professions follow documented workflow needs, not measured exact search intent. Site impressions are not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured. Checked October 9, 2026.