Check whether individual response scores preceded panel discussion. Preparation only, not an account action.
Download the free skill
One complete Markdown file. No subscription or fabricated setup files.
Download SKILL.mdWhat to provide
Response IDs, reviewer score timestamps, discussion start evidence and independent note versions.
How it works
- Match score and discussion records to the same candidate/response.
- Apply CIPD recommendation for independent scoring before group discussion.
- Distinguish late score entry from proof of influence; missing evidence stays unknown.
- Return process exceptions, not candidate ratings or hiring choices.
The output
candidate | response | reviewer | score_time | discussion_start | independent_evidence | hold
Worked fictional example
Fictional A score is at10:00,discussion starts10:05,B score entered10:08. A has supplied pre-discussion evidence; B timing needs review, not a conclusion that B was biased.
Checks and limits
Keep source versions and original values. Unknowns stay unknown. Use qualified review for regulated, legal or hiring decisions. No live account compatibility test, send, share, schedule, ledger change or payment is authorized.
More recruiters workflows · How-to guides
Method: reviewed source. Demand lead: Oct13 live AIS Search Console: marketing Copilot37 impressions, Planable/Claude43, Planable/ChatGPT24, campaignbrief12, investoragent19, MuseIndia103. Social calendar/reporting topics follow parent-query leads; other professions follow documented workflow needs, not measured exact intent. Site impressions are not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured. Checked October 13, 2026.