Interview Missing Evidence Hold

Separate a not-observed assessment criterion from evidence of poor performance. Preparation only, not an account action.

What to provide

Role criteria and rubric; interview notes tied to question IDs; candidate response opportunities; missing-note reason; reviewer policy.

How it works

1. Match each criterion to the assigned question and actual opportunity to respond.
2. Classify evidence as observed, not asked, note missing or response unclear.
3. Do not convert missing evidence into a zero score; apply only the authorized missing-data policy.
4. Prepare consistent follow-up questions for human review; do not rank or decide hiring.

The output

criterion | question | opportunity | evidence_state | source | permitted_followup | score_hold

Worked fictional example

Fictional criterion C was never asked. Mark not asked, not poor performance. Candidate B's unclear answer is a different state; neither receives an invented score.

Checks and limits

Keep source versions and original values. Unknowns stay unknown. Use qualified review for regulated, legal or hiring decisions. No live account compatibility test, send, share, schedule, ledger change or payment is authorized.

More recruiters workflows · How-to guides

Method: reviewed source. Demand lead: Oct8 live GSC through Oct5: marketing copilot 37 impressions, Planable/Claude 33 and Planable/ChatGPT 23, campaign brief 12 and reports 11. Marketing/social topics follow these parent-query leads; other professions follow method-source workflow needs, not exact query measurements. Exact monthly volume is unmeasured. Checked October 8, 2026.