Selection Evidence Consistency Review

Check that each selection claim ties back to a recorded assessment result. Preparation only, not an account action.

What to provide

Candidate assessment records and summary claims.

How it works

1. List assessment methods used.
2. Tie each summary claim to a recorded result.
3. Flag claims with no recorded evidence.
4. Return the consistency review without selection decisions.

The output

claim | method | record | evidenced | unevidenced | decision_unproved

Worked fictional example

Fictional summary says strong numeracy for two finalists; only one has a recorded test result. The claim stands for one candidate and stays unproved for the other.

Checks and limits

Keep original values, source IDs and version dates. Unknown facts stay held. Use qualified review for hiring, legal and accounting conclusions. No send, share, sign-in, scheduling, ledger change or payment. Fictional contract review is not a live account compatibility test.

More recruiters workflows · How-to guides

Method: reviewed source. Demand lead: Oct15 live AIS Search Console: marketing Copilot37 impressions, Planable/Claude45, Planable/ChatGPT24, campaignbrief12, investoragent19, MuseIndia115, cashflowforecasting13. Social calendar/reporting topics follow parent-query leads; other professions follow documented workflow needs, not measured exact intent. Site impressions are not monthly volumes; exact topic volume is unmeasured. Checked October 15, 2026.